|
|
The
making of Silk
Used for sarees, scarves, ties, garments,
accessories, embroidery threads, carpets, and
painting material. The pupae of the silk moth
weave their cocoons of a fiber so strong, fine,
and lustrous that it leads to their death. Fifteen
silk moth pupae in their cocoons are
steamed, boiled, or baked alive
to obtain just one gram of
woven
|
|
|
silk. Besides
the pupae, countless (female) moths are
crushed to death to analyse their eggs and ensure
that they are disease-free, so that they in turn
will provide only the best of
yarn.
Alternatives are rayon or
viscose (a plant product), and nylon and polyester
(petroleum products). Detailed information on silk
is available on
request. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The source of our
leather Used in garments, footwear, handbags,
wallets, purses, belts, watch- and other straps,
accessories, linings, trimmings, briefcases and
suitcases, book covers and office material,
furniture covers and upholstery and cricket and
footballs...
|
|
|
Leather is not a
by-product of the slaughter house. The skin is
always specifically paid for when the animal is
bought by the butcher. So-called ahimsak
leather in India could originate from animals put
to sleep in vivisection laboratories and dog
pounds, or calves abandoned or done to death by
dairies.
For many years now, synthetically made
material such as Rexene which resembles leather,
is available and widely used. With time the
quality of these materials has improved a lot and
is many times better than genuine leather.
Alternatively, products made from canvas can also
be
used. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rabbit
fur Used for coats, caps, garments,
accessories, trimmings, linings, handbags,
showpieces, toys, rabbit fur in India is now
obtained from farms (mostly situated in the
state of Himachal Pradesh) where they are
specially bred for the purpose. Bred, raised, and
butchered mercilessly, not even this
|
|
|
|
|
most lovable
of animals, soft as a cuddlesome toy, can evoke
feelings of pity and action of mercy from the
persons assigned to either chop its head off or
wring and break its neck . Artificial furs are available.
Besides, most importantly, being
cruelty-free,
they are
|
|
much more durable and easy to maintain.
But do we really need to wear even simulated
fur?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pig-bristle paint
brushes Used in manufacturing hair, cosmetic,
shaving, shoe polish, clothes, carpet, artist's
and wall-painting brushes and tooth brushes.
Brushes used by painters are made from hog
bristles: domestic pigs
|
|
|
are
chased, brutally caught,
and as they squeal in pain and terror, forcibly
held underfoot while their hair is yanked out.
Killed wild boar and mongoose, both protected
wildlife are other sources of animal bristles. In
certain countries, sable are especially bred on
so-called farms, to be killed and their hair is
converted into artist's and cosmetic
brushes.
An alternative to bristles of animal
origin are bristles from nylon and other synthetic
fibers, which are increasingly and readily
available. Apart from being cruelty-free, they are
of better quality and last much
longer. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snakeskin wallets
The villagers of a comparatively
little-known place, Kranthi in Thanjavur District
of Tamil Nadu are not only making shoes but also
purses, watch-straps, hand-bags and other fashion
articles out of snake
skin.
|
|
|
For
most of the year they make out a living by
cultivating their small holdings, but during
November and December the snake-skin industry
takes over. At times 40 to 50 good varieties of
snake, including the cobra are caught every day in
this snake infested area. This gives them an
additional income of Rs.20 to Rs.25 per day. Of
these, however, the cobra skin, locally known as
'saral' is the most sought after as the price is
three times that of ordinary reptile
skin.
The skin is obtained in one piece by
nailing the head to a tree, slitting the body from
end to end with a knife and then tearing the skin
off. Quite often the victim remains alive for two
or three days after the skin
operation.
The area is famous for its cobras and
other deadly snakes. In a day these reptiles
destroy rodents like the bandicoots which destroy
the paddy fields and also are instrumental in
keeping the ecological balance on an even keel.
Meanwhile no costly disinfectants are used by the
poor villagers. At the most the snake skin are
preserved in salt pots for days before being sold
off to wholesalers. The price invariably varies
with the width and the length of the skin. Those
with six inches width in width command the highest
price-ranging between Rs. 80 to Rs. 100 per
piece.
To buy snake skin scores of city merchants
descend upon the village. A lot of haggling takes
place before the price is fixed. The merchants in
turn sell these skins to madras for export to
foreign countries where they are converted into
fashion articles. Skins apart, oil has also been
extracted from snake liver which is used for
medicinal and polishing purposes. But it has not
proved to as lucrative as the fantastic prices
fetched by the
skins. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Musk Perfume
The shy timid Musk deer, a worldwide
symbol of peace and gentleness is currently being
mercilessly hunted to extinction for its musk. The
reason is profit and the target is human vanity.
However, not satisfied with pushing the musk deer
to extinction by mass slaughter, captive breeding programs
have
|
|
|
now
been set up to produce the highly priced musk. This in effect means mass
torture for the highly strung deer; the
substitution of one evil for
another.
The
Himalayan Musk deer is a small primitive cervid.
It lives at cool altitudes between 2,200–4,300
meters above sea level, on the slopes of scrub
forest in the mountain states of central and SE
Asia. It is especially sensitive to its
environment and to human presence. A unique
animal, with similarities to both deer and
antelope, it is highly regarded for the distinct
odour of musk the male secret during rutting
season. Fetching anywhere from 3–5 times its
weight in gold musk is highly priced commodity. It
is for this reason the deer has been mercilessly
hunted, hounded, shot and killed, regardless of
age and sex, to near
extinction.
Concern for the extinction of the Musk
deer led to the establishment of sanctuaries and
captive breeding programs, like those at Kufri in
Himachal Pradesh. The extraction of musk from the
male deer on these farms has shown where the true
loyalties of the Indian Government lie—not in
preserving a species on the verge of extinction,
but in blatant profiteering at whatever the
cost.
CCRAS (Central Council for Research in
Ayurveda and Siddha) described the details of one
method of extracting musk from the male deer. The
night before the operation the deer is deprived of
food and only given water. The next day it is
drugged, before exploring the genital organs to
find the 'musk pod'. When located a sterile canula
is pushed into the area. The hardened musk
granules stick to the canula and then is removed.
When allowed to recover the animal was noted to be
in an 'abnormal state' of confusion and
excitement. This is an understatement for an
animal that has been drugged and
raped!
Another method used is to 'milk' the deer
of its musk while it is still in the liquid form.
To do this the deer is physically held down.
Terrified and panic stricken it fights to free
itself while its genital are explored and
pulpated, exposing the milk white liquid musk.
This very delicate and sensitive area is then
subjected to the painful and indecent scraping of
a knife.
 |
Now, the Times of India (1987) quotes: "A
team success collected musk without trauma". The
mutilation and degradation of this timid,
sensitive animal is a major trauma, occurring from
one rutting season to the next. It should not be
praised, but stopped. There are over 80 different
|
alternatives to musk on the market plant and other
non-animal sources. With these alternatives
available, the guilt for the slaughter and rape of
the musk deer lies, not only with those who commit
the crime, but with those who continue to buy the
product.
The main markets are the perfume industry
of France and the male aphrodisiac industry of
Japan, with products spread throughout the world.
That musk from the deer should be used in
aphrodisiac is totally unnecessary and founded on
false beliefs which are out of balance with
nature. Each animal in nature produces its own
individual smell distinct to its own species,
which with certain species is quiet strong. Does
the man using such a product really believe a
smell designed specifically to attract a female
musk deer will attract a woman? Indeed, a very
'naive' attitude.
Musk is also used for its medicinal
properties in certain branches of medicine, when
there are many more effective alternatives
available. It is far preferable to use a product
which has not involved cruelty to
animals.
The idea then of these captive breeding
farms seems not to be concern for the Musk deer,
but concern for maintaining profit at whatever the
cost. Real concern should be shown by an enforced
ban on the commercial exploitation of musk and the
use of over 80 different plant and non-animal
alternatives
instead. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Experimentation
upon Rhesus monkeys
Account of US
Air Force psychologist exposes cruelty to rhesus monkeys
in radiation and gas warfare
experiments. Summary:
|
Dr. Donald Barnes, a research
psychologist, left his position at the school of
Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas,
USA, in January 1980. After performing experiments
on rhesus monkeys for 15 years, Dr. Barnes decided
that he could no longer tolerate the senseless
cruelty of
|
|
|
the experiments
and the waste of monkey
life. The experiments conducted at the school of
Aerospace medicine involved exposure of monkeys
to nuclear radiations, burning their eyes,
and in conjunction with the Aberdeen Proving
Grounds, studying the effects of
chemical-biological warfare agents such as nerve
gases.
|
Details:
Dr. Barnes began his
statement by commenting: "I can no longer perform
experiments with animals doomed, by virtue of their
participation in such experiments, to very early death,
"as well as to "pain and suffering during the final
weeks and months of their
experience."
He stated that, in each experiment, a group of
monkeys would be trained to perform a complex task
designed by psychologists, which was abnormal for
monkeys to perform, Because the behaviour was not
natural to the monkeys, they were trained by electric
shocks. Dr. Barnes claimed that, "Although the papers
written to report such experiments claim that very
low-level shock is utilised, such statements are simply
untrue. He stated that the shock generators were capable
of delivering at least 10 times the degree of shock
described in the articles, and that, "I couldn't even
guess the number of times I've seen these units used at
full power to punish a slow learner, well into the
thousands." He stated that shocking was not only problem
faced by the monkeys: the frustrated animals became
crazy and began to act in self-destructive ways such as
"biting hunks of meats from an arm or hand, pulling out
hair till the monkey is bald in all spots he can
reach."
For training sessions, the monkeys would be
placed in "primate chairs or couches". According to Dr.
Barnes, "the restraint devices are barbaric, e.g. metal
couches with metal neck, belly, and ankle restraints-as
the animal tries to free itself, it often loses its
teeth to neck-bar, gains severe abrasions on the abdomen
(often wearing through the abdominal wall, or so
severely chafes its ankles that they become infected).
"Then, the helpless monkey is shocked and shocked again,
sometimes hundreds of times per day until either does
the experimenter's bidding or is transferred to another
program".
After the monkeys are trained, those that
survived (many did not) were exposed to radiation to see
how it affected their ability to perform the task.
Various types of radiation where used, such as neutron,
gamma, or flash X-ray . Dr. Barnes stated that "In past
years, I was ordered to keep a death watch on these
irradiated injury." He asked, "Do you have any idea how
miserable it is to die of radiation injury? I do, I've
seen so many monkeys go through
it."
Dr. Barnes commented that he became more and
more disgusted by the experiments over the years: "I
discovered that this data was not used to help Man
struggle against his environment. The data was and is
used to generate more worthless experiments, thereby
killing and crippling more animals. I began to feel more
strongly that I didn't have the right to kill these
innocent creatures."
Dr. Barnes stated that experiments into the
effects of nerve gasses and other chemical-biological
warfare agents were performed at both the school of
Aerospace medicine and the Aberdeen proving grounds in
Maryland, USA. The effects of the agents and various
possible antidotes are evaluated on monkeys. These
experiments were also extremely
cruel.
According to Dr. Barnes, many monkeys are held
at the school awaiting experiments. Because he had left
in disgust, he felt that "I can no longer assure their
relative comfort" because "neither of the two program
directors has the slightest notion about the degree of
suffering experience daily be these monkeys although
they both are aware of all the conditions described and
ultimately responsible for them." A new 3-year project
was in the planning stage, according to Dr. Barnes,
which would cause pain and suffering to large number of
monkeys, but which "will not add one iota of data useful
to peaceful co-existence of humans (let alone all
creatures) on this planet."
Commenting on Dr. Barnes' revelation, Dr.
Shirley McGreal, Co-Chair-woman of the International
Primate Protection League, Commented, "All these
experiments conducted on Rhesus monkeys from India
violated the U.S.-India Agreement of 1965 which
permitted export of monkeys on condition they be treated
humanely and not used in military experimentation. This
agreement was violated from Day 1 with Brooks Air Force
Base actually placing monkeys at atomic bomb sites in
the late 1950s. Now the U.S. wants to get India to
export monkeys again and makes all kinds of promises
about how well they will be treated. At the same time,
these, these revolting experiments are going on, in
spite of protests by American animal-lovers and humane
societies. I hope therefore that India will retain its
export ban on its
monkeys." |
|
|
|
|
|
The
training of Elephants for Circuses In 1987, the Apollo circus announced in
Bombay that their 21 years old cow-elephant Rekha
had given birth to a calf. What was distressing
was that the Manager,Shri Mohan sahani stated that
the circus will begin to train the newest
member of their elephant
|
|
|
family in two or
three
months" and that "Rekha would also be back in her
role of the star cricketeer of the circus in two
weeks" Circuses have claimed that they are helping
conservations, yet not a single circus has been
known to release their captive bred animals into
the wild. Under Indian laws, Circuses cannot
purchase or exchange animals from abroad or from
Indian Zoos any more
At Rayman circus in
1998 an elephant was broken in with heavy pipes
tied down to its front legs with stout ropes. From
behind the trainer and his assistant podded in
with metal spiked bars so that it would lift its
front legs and learn to walk on its hind legs. The
elephant was finally pushed forward to do it. The
trainer said such an act would normally take three
to four months to put
together.
Shri K. Sahadevan, one
of the co-owners of the Gemini circus has stated
that in order to train circus elephants an
"Ankush" or hooked goads is necessary. The
usual place for inflicting pain is behind the
knees and under the tail. Without this hook, the
trainer cannot control the elephant. It would
throw him and run away is the explanation given by
Shri Sahadevan.
Ms.Maria Hennessey of
SOCELEX has witnessed elephants in India been
trained for circus performances. The rear legs are
whipped until they bleed to make an elephant to do
a head-stand or more correctly a nose stand. This
seemingly easy tricks, Ms.Hennessey pointed out
throws all the weight (nearly tones) on the heart.
They are also made to dance, salute, and play
cricket. And one circus boasts of a full-fledged
elephant orchestra. Another has an elephant riding
a big iron tricycle. It is excruciating even for
an elephant to sit on a wooden
block.
In March 1990, there
was a complaint from the people of Dhrubdanga,
District Burdwan (West Bengal) that they could no
longer bear the continuous cries for mercy from an
elephant been cruelly trained by Gemini circus.
The authorities had claimed the animal in front of
the ring and it had not been moved from this spot
for days on end. As a punishment all four feet are
chained and this may have been the case. Elephants
which are not chained for long hours would in the
opinion of a circus owner become neurotic tear the
tent apart and eat the bits. Speaks volumes if
correctly interpreted between the
lines. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
caging of Birds The live bird business, much like the rest
of the animal business, is not an organized trade.
It is dependent on a long-chain of individual
trappers who are largely very poor. Most trappers
in India are professionals belonging to certain
castes of tribes whose techniques have been passed
down for generations.
|
 |
 |
|
|
For trapping, a substance called Bird Lime
is commonly used. It is a substance made from a
combination of sap from the peepal tree and slaked
lime. It is applied to the inside of two slender
wings bound as a fork to a series of extension
poles. The trapper, with dexterity, reaches the
bird without disturbing it. He touches it in the
right spot so that it gets stuck to the pole. This
is a method used to trap small insectivorous
species like the Barbet and
Flycatcher.
The other trap, also made from lime
sticks, is a dome like contraption. A string from
the top of the dome suspends a small insect.
Birds, which look for prey on the ground, are
caught by this method. The other method is to hang
lime sticks from tree and a decoy bird is made to
whistle to attract the desired
bird.
Clap net, also widely used, is a method by
which a jute net is pegged to the ground from two
edges while the other two are held up by thin
bamboo sticks manipulated by a long
string.
Removing fledglings from their nest
catches some birds. The Alexandrine parakeet and
the Hill Mynah are two species, which are obtained
in this way. Trappers have become so adept that
they feed the chicks kept in lined baskets in the
same manner as the mother-bird. For instance, the
trapper taps the edge of the basket which sounds
like the arrival of the mother-bird to the
sightless chicks. They immediately open their
beaks and the trapper drops tiny insects into
them. As they develop sight and cannot be easily
fooled the Garo tribesmen restore to a unique
method. They remove the chicks from the nest at a
very early stage. The trapper holds the insects in
the mouth and the bird snatches it with its beak,
again very much the same manner as it would from
its mother.
Slip-noose and mist-nets is another
method, by far the most hazardous to the bird. The
mist-net catches all birds, which might be flying
into it. Struggling in the net, most birds suffer
serious injury. There are a large number of other
traditional traps as well. One ingenious method is
a series of slip-noose, which are attached to a
cow’s back, and the workable string is tied to the
cow’s tail. The noose opens and closes with the
swishing of the cow’s tail. By the end of the day,
the trapper finds at least two birds caught in the
slip-noose. Here too there is a danger of the
bird’s leg getting
damaged.
In India, birds are trapped primarily in
the northern states of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh –
mainly around the Gangetic plain and the foothills
of the Himalayas. Others are found in the south in
Orissa, Madhya Pradesh, Maharastra and Deccan
Plateau. Assam and the higher reaches in the
North-East are rich in bird
species.
The Mumbai market is supplied by Ranchi
whereas the Patna and Hajipur stock supplies Uttar
Pradesh and Delhi. The main bird markets are
Nakhas in Lucknow, Hati Bagan and Hoga market in
Kolkatta, while Meerut supplies The Delhi bird
trade.
The major share of this trade consists of
parakeets caught from the wild, in direct
violation of the Wildlife
Act. | |
|
|
|
|
|
The delicacy called Frog's
Legs The export of frog legs from India was
started in the early sixties and it was evident
and this would be harmful to agriculture. Working
under a grant from the Indian Council of
Agricultural Research, this has been
|
|
|
well established and the following is largely an abstract from a detailed report on the project published in the journal of the Bombay Natural History Society (vol 82(2) pp. 347-375). It is noticed that the large Bull frogs (Rana tigrina) actually breed only at the break of the monsoon, which may be any time between 15th May and 25th June.
The commercial
collecting of frogs in the Konkan ends is about
November, in Gujarat, Bengal and Andhra Pradesh,
collecting continues even later, for the locals
dig them out of theiraestivating holes where many
are said to be often found together. Collecting in
Tamil Nadu and Kerala continues after the monsoon
because of wet conditions created by the northeast
monsoon and the heavier
rainfall.
The live frog is
purchased at price between Rs. 2/- and Rs. 4.50
per kg. As only one-third is covered as finally
processed legs, the base cost of the legs is Rs.
6/- to Rs. 13.50 per Kg. While (1976-79) F.O.B.
prices were around Rs. 25/- per Kg. (up to 40/- in
1985). This leaves the difference as the
exporter's profit, less the actual cost of
processing and shipping.
All frogs of the genus
Rana have now been brought on the list of animals
protected under the wildlife (Protection) Act 1972
and the packers have to obtain licenses and
collect and process the legs according to certain
terms and conditions. This year (1985-86) the
export quota of 4000 tons has been reduced to
2500. Frog legs after skinning, cleaning, trimming
and processing amount to about 1/3rd of the weight
of the live frog. 90% of the frogs' food in the Konkan has
been ascertained to consist of crabs, insect and
insect larvae. The frog therefore takes the role
of controller of whatever food item that shows an
increase in numbers.
The total quantity
exported in 1981 was 4368 tons, which is
equivalent to 13104 tons of live frogs. The food
obtained in the stomachs of the several thousand
examined was as high as 30% of the total weight of
the frog but taking a very moderate estimate of
10%, their removal results in the survival or non
destruction of 1310 tons of frog food every day,
which during 4 months 10 days (June to September)
adds up to 156000 tons of frog food i.e. 140,000
tons (approx. 90%) of crop pests not eaten. For
every additional year that the animal would have
lived, each figure will have to be increased i.e.
doubled for two years, tripled for three years,
et. Seq., until the total frog population has
reached the original level, which was presumably
ecological stable. The minimum figure in the
second year would be 200,000 tons of crop
pests.
One can say without
hesitation that the removal of large numbers of
frogs from their environment upsets the existing
balance of nature, and in cultivated areas the
process is highly detrimental to
crops. The value of imported pesticides used in
India every year was said to be rupees 200 crores
(some years ago) and it is anybody's guess as to
how much of this is needed to kill the pests which
have escaped the frogs.
4368 tons of frog leg
exports were valued in (1981) at Rs. 12 crores and
we find that for every 38 paisas earned in foreign
exchange, we have, allowing a 2 year life span for
each frog prevented the destruction of 1 Kg. of
agricultural pests. What is the cost to be
incurred for their
destruction? The frog is not ordinarily eaten in India
and its removal does not lessen any food normally
available to the villager. A circular was sent to
1650 police patils in Thana and Kolaba (now
Raigadh) and a very emphatic opinion was expressed
by the villagers to the effect that the removal of
the frog is harmful to agriculture. This is
unprejudiced and must command
respect. Collecting the frogs does provide labour
for some kathoris, and other tribals, but this
activity coincides with that of rice planting and
harvesting and much of this work is done at night
involving trespass and damage to standing crops.
The real profits are made by the middleman i.e.
the processors and the
exporters.
An inordinate amount
of cruelty is attached to this business. The frog
is caught alive and several hundred are dumped
into a gunny bag, which is banged on the ground to
permit the contents to settle and then sewn
up. Many such bags are then piles into trucks
and driven hundreds of miles to the cutting
centers, reaching them several days after capture.
We have been informed of consignments in which 90%
of the frogs were found dead upon
arrival.
At the cutting
centers, they are extracted hind legs, placed
under a chopper, and cut into two parts, the front
and rear halves both being left to die separately
- the front half of the frog resting on its
bleeding belly, propped up by its fore feet and
staring helplessly at the world around it, is a
ghastly sight. Prior to this cutting, the animal
is momentarily dipped into a solution of salt and
chlorine, which is said to be anesthetic. This is
not so, for the solution is only used as a ward
against Salmonella and other infections and does
not lessen the pain in any
manner.
On October 10, 1985
the Government declared that Export Licenses for
frozen frog legs will now be issued only to those
who kill the amphibians by the painless electrical
stunning method developed by scientists of the
college of Fisheries, Mangalore. This does not
very much lessen the cruelty & other harm done
by the business. However the fact that the annual
quota has been reduced from 4000 tonnes to 2500
tonnes is in my opinion an appreciable reduction
& considering the publicity which the whole
matter is receiving in different ways today, I
have every hope that the business will be stopped
in a few
years. | |
|
|
Top |
|
|
Poultry
With the possible exception of fish, the hen is the animal that suffers the most for the sake of our food in sheer number of lives taken. If in addition to these numbers, one considers the quality of these lives - lives banished to a lifetime of imprisonment and immobility for laying eggs - then their suffering might exceed that of fish.
|
|
The hen was one of the first victims of the modern, intensive method of farming animals, called 'factory farming' for the mechanised methods employed to raise and 'harvest' the animals. Compared to the industrialised West, where this intensive method has practically completely replaced the traditional barnyard chicken farming, in India, one can still find chicken farming done both along traditional lines - mainly in rural areas - and in the modernised fashion (intensive factory farming) - for the urban market. However, the vastly greater output of the intensive system compared to the traditional system is hastening the progress of the latter to the pages of history.
What, then, are some of the cruelties involved in the raising of hen for food?
Intensive poultry farming:
The relegation of hen to the status of inanimate, unfeeling vegetables, almost, is the most tragic outcome of the intensification of poultry farming. To have its bodily freedom snatched away, its every natural instinct frustrated, its parental instincts denied expression, and to be raised in surroundings completely alien to its natural requirements, all at the hands of the creature - man - who has fought wars to retain for himself these very privileges that he now denies the 'lower' beings is the story of the moral decline of man.
Hen are raised for two purposes: (1) the 'Layers' for laying eggs, and (2) the 'Broilers' for being killed for chicken meat. Ironically it is the hen that is raised for remaining alive and 'producing' (eggs) whose quality of suffering is far worse than that of the hen that is raised to be killed.
The sole objective of intensive farming is increased production and economy of operation. India was the fifth largest producer of eggs in 1996 with an output of 1.5 million tonnes. Chicken reared in 1997: 1.7 million layers (for eggs) and 4.4 million broilers (for meat) plus 130 million birds as commercial layers. The means adopted for achieving this production is briefly described below.
Glimpse into a poultry farm:
The layers are crowded in small cages made of wire-mesh in which they can hardly move or spread their wings. This lack of space to stretch their limbs causes their legs to get deformed. Artificial lighting round the clock simulates daylight and thereby tricks chickens into laying more eggs. Painful de-beaking is done to prevent them from injuring themselves and others during fights that break out as a natural consequence of their close and stressful confinement. They are fed yellow colour, antibiotics, and hormones daily. It is not surprising that this unnatural and artificial diet could very well include crushed oyster shells called oyster-grit. Every thing fed is for a specific production advantage such as the coloured dye for darker yellow egg-yolks. The chicks are separated from their mothers at birth. Excess male chicks not to be raised as broilers are generally killed by crushing whereas the female ones are raised for egg production.
Eggs
All the eggs that come from traditional farming are fertile ones, i.e. carrying a live embryo inside them. Mixing of fertile eggs with infertile ones that come from intensive poultry farms is a frequent occurrence. Moreover it is quite common for some unwanted fertile ones from factory farms to be passed off for sale along with the infertile eggs.
Transport of chickens/hens
The treatment of live chickens during transport to selling points and butcheries is an everyday sight. They are transported to far away cities in overcrowded lorries, without food and water and often subjected to the hot sun or rain for long hours. They can also be seen carried upside down in bunches hanging from the handlebars of bicycles, their legs tied together, or crammed into baskets in suffocating conditions, kept by the roadside for sale. They are sometimes taken directly to restaurants where they await slaughter upon orders received from customers.
The look of Poultry Farming in the future
The Poultry Federation of India has plans for carcass utilisation to convert all the refuse of animals into edible meat, fertiliser and fat for candle units. Whereas the National Egg Co-ordination Committee continue in their false propaganda extolling the nutritive value of eggs, schemes for marketing eggs such as introducing them in mid-day meals of school children have attracted the wrath of vegetarians in all states, especially when numerous cases of food poisoning have been registered. Excess production is turned into comminuted chicken and egg powder and promoted with pride as nutritional health supplements for the benefit of humans, e.g. Venper, Vengain and Venfit from Western Hatcheries Ltd of the Venkateshwara Group. Unfortunately the success of poultry farming can be mainly attributed to Government support by way of liberal credit schemes by Banks, promotion of egg consumption via the national media, and at Expos etc. where "egg-cellent" business opportunities are extensively advertised. Also, had the Government of India not included intensive poultry farming as an agricultural activity, this killing industry would not have grown to the extent it has today.
|
|
|
Top
|
| |